A Comparison of RuBisCo Protein Expression
  in Bundle-Sheath Cells of CAM & C3 Plants

 
  C3 plants used: Ficus benjamina, Hosta fortunei
  CAM plants used: Kalanchoe daigremontiana, Crassula argentea


RUBISCO.
  Each holoenzyme is composed of 8 large (blue & light blue) and 8 small (red & orange) subunits.  The yellow loops indicate the positions of the active-site.
Courtesy of:
www.wcrl.ars.usda.gov

 

 
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION

WORKS CITED



Research contacts:
Brittney Roberts

Megan Russell
Sarah Shahmoradian



COURSE
HOMEPAGE


UNIVERSITY
HOMEPAGE


 

Fall 2005
BIO480: Dr. Terrie Rife
Tuesday Group 5

 

METHODS

Collection of Bundle Sheath Cells: The plants used in this experiment were gathered from the JMU Biology Department's greenhouse located beside Burruss Hall with the help of Dr. Brubaker. The bundle sheath cells were shaved from the underside of the C3 leaves using a razor blade, and from the inner part of the fleshy CAM plants. Two grams were collected of each sample and used in the first part of the experiment.

Left Arrow: C3 plant leaf cross-section, bundle sheath cell
Left Arrow: CAM plant leaf cross-section, bundle sheath cell



Protein Isolation: The DC Protein Assay (BioRad) based on the Lowery Assay was used to determine the protein concentration of our samples. This in turn was used to determine the amount of protein to be used in the Western Blot procedure. The protein isolation procedure was used to create a standard curve of the protein concentration of the samples versus their absorbance at 750nm. The curve was then used to convert the absorbances into protein concentrations.

DNA Extraction: This protocol allowed us to break open the cells and isolate genomic DNA. This DNA was precipitated and its absorbance was measured to determine the concentration of the DNA. This DNA was used in the next step of the experiment, Real Time PCR. *Only three of our samples showed a significant concenration of DNA, therefore we decided to eliminate Hosta fortunei from our experiment.

Real Time PCR
: In using Real Time PCR, we were able to verify the presence of the gene for Rubisco. The PCR product was detected using the sybr green dye which fits between the bases of double stranded DNA. Primer set C was used.

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA: The agarose gel electrophoresis allowed us to separate the DNA fragments produced by the previous procedure, Real Time PCR.

Western Blot: There were two parts to this procedure. The first part used SDS- PAGE(Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis) to separate the proteins based on their size alone. The negatively charged SDS in the procedure coats the individual proteins which negates their charge. The proteins are also denatured at 100 degrees Celsius with a reducing agent present. A marker is used to determine the size of the proteins. The second part of the Western Blot calls for the transfer of the proteins on the gel onto a membrane. This membrane will be used in the subsequent detection of the Rubisco protein using antibodies.

Antibody Detection: This procedure uses primary and secondary antibodies to detect the Rubisco protein. The primary antibody was chicken anti- Rubisco. This antibody was made against a conserved region of the large subunit of the Rubisco protein. The secondary antibody was made in a goat and binds to all chicken antibodies. The secondary antibody was chemically coupled to alkaline phosphatase which breaks down a colorless substrate into a purple substance. This color change allows us to have some idea of how much protein is located in a particular plant.