|
Discussion of Results and Conclusions |
|
|||
Analysis of DNA ResultsWe hypothesized that flowering plants grown in full sun conditions would demonstrate higher levels of chloroplasts in leaf tissues compared to lower levels of RBCL production. Adversely, plants grown in full shade will have lower levels of chloroplasts and higher levels of RBCL. Differing optimal light densities was an additional factor in the selection of plant models and in production of the hypothesis of this study. Since no significant change in chloroplast levels compared to RBCL could be made between the two species related to their optimal light requirements, it will not be discussed at this time. Optimal light requirements and rubisco levels was found to be a related, yet separate variable that could be a target for future studies.Purity was consistent among species, albeit a low purity for the Nirvana specimens Table 1 . Modification to procedure of DNA isolation would probably remedy this to produce higher DNA/protein ratios. A high protein concentration accounts for the low purity, absorbing light at 280 nm and lowering the ratio DNA/protein. Using the absorbance of our samples at 260 nm, DNA concentration was calculated. This was an essential step to interpreting the results as confined to just DNA. Chloroplast content was determined by using Real Time PCR to compare Rubisco gene copies. Real Time PCR was used to amplify the Rubisco gene. Impatiens grown in the shade had the lowest starting concentration of the Rubisco gene (Figure 1). Impatiens grown in the sun has the lowest Ct of 2.8, an indication that Rubisco gene was present in highest amounts (starting concentration) out of all our samples (Figure 1). The Nirvana species grown in sun has a lower starting amount of the RUBISCO gene than Nirvana grown in shade (Figure 1). Real Time data does support our hypothesis in terms of the Impatiens species, however, the Nirvanas does not coincide with our hypothesis because it indicates that there were more chloroplasts in leaf tissues grown in the shade than in the sun. The blank control with primers only amplified DNA due to its Ct value of 24.4, pointing to a mild degree of contamination. Melting temperatures for our DNA samples (Tm) (Figure 2) indicated that the suitable temperature of annealing for PCR is ~ 81.5 degrees. The Real Time PCR reaction, with standards (Figure 3), allowed for the semi-quantization of our sample. Our original amounts of the Rubisco gene are as follows: Impatiens sun (not able to be determined), Impatiens shade ~ 256 pg, ~ 400 pg Nirvana Sun, ~512 pg Nirvana Sun. These amounts are very generalized since some standards were discounted due to ineffective PCR reaction. One problem that occurred was the ladder in our agarose gel (Figure 4) did not run with the samples. This is probably due to running the gel in an apparatus with buffer that was too concentrated for a brief period. Too much current flowed through the gel causing it to warp. Our ladder and samples do not line up, so we cannot say for sure that Rubisco DNA sequence amplified. An alternative procedure to running the agarose gel that would help in confirming our results would be to sequence the PCR product. Having the sequence would allow to say for sure that our PCR product is Rubsico, and add some degree of certainty to our PCR reaction. By comparing with other groups gels, we can (unofficially) assume that Rubisco gene was amplified based on similarities between gel photographs. Analysis of Protein ExpressionUtilizing a SDS page and Western Blot technique we could compare the level of gene expression between the four types of plants and their designated growth conditions. It was hypothesized that Rubisco gene expression would be lower in plants with higher Chloroplast content. Although the following does not support or refute our hypothesis, Rubisco expression can be compared in the Nirvana species. Group generated standards, allowed us to generate a standard curve (Figure 5 B) and equation from which sample concentration could be calculated. Sample 1.1 is Impatiens shade at 1:2 dilution, 2.2 is Impatiens sun at 1:20 dilution, 3.3 is Nirvana shade at 1:200, 4.2 is Nirvana sun at 1:20. Each sample dilution was chosen based on how well its absorbance fit on the graph in Fig 2. Knowing sample concentration allowed for consistent amounts of protein to be loaded into the Western Blot, which allowed us to make accurate conclusions about Rubisco in our hypothesis. The combined figures SDS-Page electrophoresis gel Figure 6 A and Western Blot Figure 6 B show that Rubisco is present in our samples. The marker for Western Blot ran faintly, however for confirmation by comparing the marker from the Comassie Blue the Western Blot data can still be useful. Assuming the lower bands are of the correct weight (Comassie Blue electrophoresis gel), the appearance of Rubisco bands can be estimated. The positive control for Rubsico ran fine on the Western Blot, also helping us to estimate bands. Higher amounts of Rubisco are visible in Nirvana, more specifically Nirvana grown in sun. Nirvana grown in shade has a slightly fainter band. This does not support our hypothesis that plants grown in sun will produce lower levels of Rubisco. It is however impossible by these results to determine how much transcriptional activity is taking place per chloroplast. Also it is uncertain as to whether any further hypothesis can be made from the limited amount of data we have for protein expression among all samples. Bands for Impatiens did not show, this may be because the bands were not amplified enough to be detected by the camera, or problems in protein isolating may have occurred due to leaf consistency (thick leaves and very slimy in solution form).
Future Spin-off ExperimentsMany experiments can be done to expand on our original hypothesis. Another venture would be to test the same hypothesis on C3,C4, and CAM plants and compare the results. The C3 plants method of carbon fixation is best suited to areas with high CO2 concentrations, C4 and CAM plants are able to fix carbon in the presence of lower concentrations of CO2. This would give insight on how plants use adaptations in RBCL and chloroplasts levels to fix carbon in various environments. Similarly, this type of experiment need not be limited to terrestrial plants. Aquatic species can be tested for RBCL and chloroplast variation due to dissolved CO2 in water. In addition, methods for an experiment using aquatic plants may allow for more control over dissolved gas levels due to aerators and water quality testing equipment available for aquariums. This can also be applied to organisms outside of plants. Photosynthetic bacteria with plasmids can be utilized and investigated incorporating some procedures from our experiment. Plasmid DNA can be extracted via miniprep and analyzed with PCR. This can be compared to genomic and chloroplast DNA isolated from the same bacteria. |
Outline of Discussion 1. PCR Results 2. Western Blot 3. Future Ideas |
|||